Hahaha here's the thing: That's actually how I felt when I was reading it over.

So while I left it as a "cliffhanger", I honestly don't know if I'll write that next article. I just needed a way to conclude this one and that sounded ok.

The reason I didn't go much into Go is because I came into contact with Nim with some people mentioning it on the same sentence as Python, so that's how I approached the article.

It was, let's say, a piece investigating the question in the title: A Python Substitute? And the answer turned out to be no.

So yeah, I'd have liked to go into Go ;D more, but at that point I was in too deep, and the real focus was Nim itself anyway, which, Syntax-wise at least, can be compared a bit to Python.

Thanks for your thoughts though!